THE ULTIMATE KNOWLEDGE BASE

The BKREA Market Intelligence

Plain-English answers on zoning, air rights, development value, and selling — written for owners, not lawyers.

Comparisons

Strong Conversion Candidate vs. Poor Conversion Candidate

Characteristic Strong Candidate Poor Candidate
Floor plate depth Shallow — under ~65–70 ft from core to exterior wall, enabling window access for most units Deep — over 80+ ft, leaving interior areas without natural light or ventilation
Core placement Off-center or side core — allows double-loaded corridor with units on both sides Central core — limits unit layout options and reduces rentable efficiency
Construction date Pre-1990 — typically eligible under current conversion rules; solid masonry construction Post-2000 curtain wall construction — not eligible under most programs; also harder to convert
Floor-to-floor height 10+ ft — accommodates residential finishes and still meets code minimums Under 9 ft — too low for residential ceiling heights after structure and MEP are accounted for
Building systems Outdated but replaceable — uniform risers, vertical wet columns, manageable asbestos Complex, custom, or distributed systems requiring full gut and significant structural work
Zoning district R, C, or M1 districts with residential use permitted or newly permitted under City of Yes Heavy manufacturing (M2, M3) — residential generally not permitted; requires rezoning
Existing tenancy Vacant or short-term leases expiring soon — clean path to possession Long-term office leases with creditworthy tenants — conversion may be 5–10 years away
Footprint size Manageable mid-size building — allows a clear, efficient unit layout Very large (400,000+ SF) — complex unit mix; phasing required; financing more difficult
Street frontage Multiple street-facing facades — maximizes number of units with direct light and air Interior lot with limited frontage — fewer window-eligible units per floor

Bottom line: A building with a shallow floor plate, off-center core, pre-1990 construction, adequate floor-to-floor height, and expiring tenancy is a strong conversion candidate. A building that fails on two or more of these criteria should be evaluated for outright sale or redevelopment rather than conversion.